Revision Stem
The LimaCorporate Revision Stem provides reliable distal fixation, with the stem giving diaphyseal fit, and the fins anchoring into the cortex for rotational stability. The modular necks offer the flexibility to match the patient’s biomechanics.
Please note that not all products are available and registered in every market: contact your LimaCorporate Sales Representative for any further information.
Benefits
01
Designed to offer total freedom of choice to the orthopedic surgeon
02
98% clinical survivorship at 10 years
03
Unchanged design since 1998
3D View
Images
About
LimaCorporate’s Revision Stem offers orthopedic surgeons the freedom to separate bony fixation from biomechanical restauration.
The stem offers distal fixation thanks to the conical shape, enhanced by fins for rotational stability. The Grit blasted stem finish allows for bone long-term fixation. The modular necks have a free choice of rotation and a range of offsets and heights to allow the biomechanics to be restored independent of the stem fixation.
Their modular design aids to recover biomechanical parameters. The stem features a unique four degree offset of the stem's male taper. This allows for fine tuning biomechanics and/or bone preservation of the Greater Trochanter. The Stem furthermore utilizes a trusted 12/14 taper whose design and manufacturing heritage is unchanged since 1992. An increased fatigue resistance is achieved by the shot-peening process applied to the taper junction. To alleviate the risk of point loading, the distal tip provides a rounded design.
Revision Stem instrumentation and surgical technique is simple, effective and straight forward.
See bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Baktır A, Karaaslan F, Gencer K, Karaoğlu S. Femoral Revision Using the Wagner SL Revision Stem: A Single-Surgeon Experience Featuring 11-19 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):827-34
[2] Kang JS, Na Y, Ko BS, Jeon YS. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018812241
[3] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7):993–9.
[4] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Kim SM, Jeong M, Park SH. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted and Tapered Distal Fixation Stem: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA); 2015 Sep 30 – Oct 3; Vienna, Austria.
[5] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Kim SM, Jeong M, Park SH. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted and Tapered Distal Fixation Stem: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA); 2015 Sep 30 – Oct 3; Vienna, Austria.
[6] Perticarini L, Benazzo F. Conical Modular Revision Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Congress of the European Federation of National Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT); 2017 May 31-June 2; Vienna, Austria.
[7] Xue L, Koul AK, Bibby M, Wallace W, Islam M. A survey of surface treatments improve the fretting fatigue resistance of Ti- 6Al-4V. Trans. on Eng. Sci. 1995;8:265-72.
[8] Piovani L, Perticarini L, Peschiera V, Benazzo F. Hip revision surgery with the modular revision stem. Hip Int. 2014;24(5):528.
[9] Perticarini L, Benazzo F. Conical Modular Revision Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Congress of the European Federation of National Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT); 2017 May 31-June 2; Vienna, Austria.
[10] ST. Ville JA, Ecker JA, Winget JM, Berghauer MH.The Anatomy of Mid Thigh Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest. 1991;12(2):198-214.
[11] Fottner A, Woiczinski M, Kistler M, Schröder C, Schmidutz TF, Jansson V, Schmidutz F . Varus malalignment of cementless hip stems provides sufficient primary stability but highly increases distal strain distribution. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Oct;58:14-20.
[1] Baktır A, Karaaslan F, Gencer K, Karaoğlu S. Femoral Revision Using the Wagner SL Revision Stem: A Single-Surgeon Experience Featuring 11-19 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):827-34
[2] Kang JS, Na Y, Ko BS, Jeon YS. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018812241
[3] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7):993–9.
[4] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Kim SM, Jeong M, Park SH. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted and Tapered Distal Fixation Stem: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA); 2015 Sep 30 – Oct 3; Vienna, Austria.
[5] Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Kim SM, Jeong M, Park SH. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted and Tapered Distal Fixation Stem: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA); 2015 Sep 30 – Oct 3; Vienna, Austria.
[6] Perticarini L, Benazzo F. Conical Modular Revision Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Congress of the European Federation of National Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT); 2017 May 31-June 2; Vienna, Austria.
[7] Xue L, Koul AK, Bibby M, Wallace W, Islam M. A survey of surface treatments improve the fretting fatigue resistance of Ti- 6Al-4V. Trans. on Eng. Sci. 1995;8:265-72.
[8] Piovani L, Perticarini L, Peschiera V, Benazzo F. Hip revision surgery with the modular revision stem. Hip Int. 2014;24(5):528.
[9] Perticarini L, Benazzo F. Conical Modular Revision Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Congress of the European Federation of National Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT); 2017 May 31-June 2; Vienna, Austria.
[10] ST. Ville JA, Ecker JA, Winget JM, Berghauer MH.The Anatomy of Mid Thigh Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest. 1991;12(2):198-214.
[11] Fottner A, Woiczinski M, Kistler M, Schröder C, Schmidutz TF, Jansson V, Schmidutz F . Varus malalignment of cementless hip stems provides sufficient primary stability but highly increases distal strain distribution. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Oct;58:14-20.
Sizing
& Options
Wagner Type stem, uncemented Ti6Al4V
Ø14 to 26mm, 1mm increments
Length 140mm, 200mm
4° taper offset
Modular Neck Hights 50mm to 110mm (10mm increments)
Std offset 135°
Lateralized offset 131°
Papers
Resources
Related Products
Acetabular Cups / DELTA System Primary
DELTA TT
The LimaCorporate DELTA TT is a hemispherical cementless acetabular cup manufactured in Trabecular Titanium through the process of additive manufacturing. Breaking new ground in orthopedic technology, it combines the unique features of the DELTA System with the Trabecular Titanium structure.
Disclaimer
Please note that not all products are available and registered in every market. Please contact your LimaCorporate Sales Representative for any further information.
LPSI, SpaceFlex e SYMBOL® are distributed by Limacorporate S.p.A.
BIOLOX® / BIOLOX®delta / BIOLOX OPTION® is a registered trademark of a company of the CeramTec Group, Germany.
LPSI, SpaceFlex e SYMBOL® are distributed by Limacorporate S.p.A.
BIOLOX® / BIOLOX®delta / BIOLOX OPTION® is a registered trademark of a company of the CeramTec Group, Germany.